HealthBench Professional

Anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5 on HealthBench Professional

rank 4 of 31 · updated September 30, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5 scores 0.656 on HealthBench Professional, rank 4 of 31 models on the board. HealthBench Professional scores models on 525 tasks drawn from real clinician conversations, graded criterion by criterion against physician-written rubrics on a 0 to 1 scale.

Result and API facts

rank4 of 31
score0.656
labAnthropic
context window1M tokens
API price per 1M tokens$4.00 in / $20.00 out
licenseproprietary
sourceClaude Opus 5.5 System Card (system card)
released2026-09-22

Position in the field

The gap to the leader, GPT-6 Astra (Anthropic run) at 0.703, is 0.047. Directly above sits Claude Fable 5 at 0.660. Directly below sits GPT-6 Astra at 0.647. The scores on this page are compiled from published documents rather than from one controlled run, so a small gap between 2 models can reflect a difference in grader version, reasoning effort, or deployment setting as well as a difference in capability.

Source of this score

Read from Claude Opus 5.5 System Card (system card, Anthropic, 2026-09-22). Vendor-reported. Confidence: verified. Configuration: Anthropic; adaptive max effort; Opus 4.8 grader; five trials; no tools or custom system prompt; safety classifiers and refusal fallback to Opus 5; length-adjusted; raw 77.1%.

8.15.2 HealthBench Professional results length adjustment, which penalizes verbose model responses, Claude Opus 5.5 achieved a score of 65.6%.

pp. 213–214, Section 8.15.2, paragraph and Figure 8.15.2.A. · full entry on the sources page

What does Claude Opus 5.5 score on HealthBench Professional?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores 0.656 on HealthBench Professional, which places it at rank 4 of 31 models on the board as of September 30, 2026. The number was read from Claude Opus 5.5 System Card, listed on the sources page.

How much does Claude Opus 5.5 cost to run?

Claude Opus 5.5 is priced at $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens through Anthropic's API.

Head to head

Pairings with a dedicated comparison page are linked; every other difference is in the score-difference matrix.

Where the scores come from and how they are read is on the methodology page. The full ranking is on the leaderboard.