Claude Fable 5 on HealthBench Professional
rank 1 of 9 · updated August 16, 2026
Claude Fable 5 scores 0.660 on HealthBench Professional, rank 1 of 9 evaluated models. Anthropic's top-tier model, positioned above the Opus line for the hardest reasoning work. HealthBench Professional scores models on 525 tasks drawn from real clinician conversations, graded criterion by criterion against physician-written rubrics on a 0 to 1 scale.
Result and API facts
| rank | 1 of 9 |
|---|---|
| score | 0.660 |
| lab | Anthropic |
| context window | 1.0M tokens |
| API price per 1M tokens | $10.00 in / $50.00 out |
| license | proprietary |
| released | 2026-06-09 |
Position in the field
Claude Fable 5 leads the leaderboard, 0.055 ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol in second place. Scores on this page come from the same evaluation run, so differences between models are differences on identical tasks, not across configurations.
What does Claude Fable 5 score on HealthBench Professional?
Claude Fable 5 scores 0.660 on HealthBench Professional, which places it at rank 1 of 9 evaluated models as of August 16, 2026.
How much does Claude Fable 5 cost to run?
Claude Fable 5 is priced at $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens through Anthropic's API.
Head to head
Pairings with a dedicated comparison page are linked; every other difference is in the score-difference matrix.
- 0.660 vs 0.605 · Claude Fable 5 by 0.055
- 0.660 vs 0.598 · Claude Fable 5 by 0.062
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 50.660 vs 0.578 · Claude Fable 5 by 0.082
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra0.660 vs 0.577 · Claude Fable 5 by 0.083
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.80.660 vs 0.558 · Claude Fable 5 by 0.102
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Luna0.660 vs 0.557 · Claude Fable 5 by 0.103
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5 Instant0.660 vs 0.384 · Claude Fable 5 by 0.276
- Claude Fable 5 vs MAI-Thinking-10.660 vs 0.350 · Claude Fable 5 by 0.310
How tasks are selected and graded is on the methodology page. The full ranking is on the leaderboard.